PDF PECB ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR FORMAT & ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR VALID EXAM REVIEW

Pdf PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Format & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Review

Pdf PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Format & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Review

Blog Article

Tags: Pdf ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Format, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Review, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Free Updates, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps.zip, Certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Sample Questions

In the 21st century, all kinds of examinations are filled with the life of every student or worker. We need to pass some exams to get the corresponding certificates like ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certification, so as to get the recognition of enterprises and society. However, passing an ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam is not easy, and a large number of people fail to pass it every year, as is the case with the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam. But if you choose to buy our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials, you will pass the exam easily.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
Topic 2
  • Preparing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
Topic 3
  • Managing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
Topic 4
  • Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
Topic 5
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.

>> Pdf PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Format <<

Pass Guaranteed Quiz PECB - ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor - ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Accurate Pdf Format

Our ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps give help to give you an idea about the actual ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam. You can attempt multiple ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam questions on the software to improve your performance. You have the option to change the topic and set the time according to the actual PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q79-Q84):

NEW QUESTION # 79
Question:
Which of the following responsibilities belongs to the certification body?

  • A. Communicating the audit plan
  • B. Updating the audit plan
  • C. Ensuring the establishment of the audit plan

Answer: C

Explanation:
It is thecertification body's responsibilitytoensure that an audit plan is establishedprior to the audit.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1requires certification bodies to"ensure that an audit plan is established, communicated, and agreed upon."
* Updating or communicating the plan can be tasksdelegated to the audit team leader, but the accountabilityfor establishing the audit plan remains with the certification body.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1.


NEW QUESTION # 80
Which among the following is NOT a level of AI?

  • A. Artificial Narrow Intelligence
  • B. Artificial Super Intelligence
  • C. Artificial Machine Intelligence
  • D. Artificial General Intelligence

Answer: C

Explanation:
The levels of AI commonly referenced in bothISO/IEC 42001guidance materials and AI governance literature include:
* Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI)- Specialized in a single task
* Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)- Human-level general problem-solving capability
* Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI)- Hypothetical AI surpassing human intelligence Artificial Machine Intelligenceisnot a formally recognized leveland doesnot appear in ISO/IEC 42001, nor in PECB's standard AI terminology.
The PECB Lead Auditor Guide defines the recognized levels under AI system classification and clarifies that terms like "Artificial Machine Intelligence" arenon-standard or colloquialand not part of professional auditing or ISO frameworks.
Reference: PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: Section "AI Fundamentals," Topic: "Types and Levels of AI" ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - While not listing these levels explicitly, relies on industry-aligned terminology consistent with ANI, AGI, and ASI


NEW QUESTION # 81
Which core element emphasizes that AI systems should be designed to avoid bias and ensure fair treatment for all individuals?

  • A. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
  • B. Accountability
  • C. Transparency and Explainability
  • D. Human-Centered Design

Answer: A

Explanation:
The principle ofFairness and Non-Discriminationis one of the core ethical and governance pillars emphasized inISO/IEC 42001:2023, especially inClause 4.2 (Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties)andClause 6.1 (Actions to address risks and opportunities)where ethical risks related to AI systems are assessed.
According to the standard and accompanying PECB training guide, fairness is defined as ensuring thatAI systems do not create or perpetuate bias, and that individuals and groups aretreated equitably, with measures in place to detect and mitigate discrimination. This is often embedded in risk assessments and operational controls when managing AI systems.
In ISO/IEC 42001, organizations are required to considerethical, legal, and societal impactsof their AI systems, andFairness and Non-Discriminationis a key tenet oftrustworthy AI.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clauses 4.2, 6.1.2, and 8.2.3
PECB Lead Auditor Course Guide, Section on "Ethical Principles of AI," Subsection: Fairness and Non- Discrimination


NEW QUESTION # 82
Scenario 9 (continued):
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assessand boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and copyright its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Question:
In the context of Roger's action plan at Securisai, was the plan he developed a general plan or a detailed plan?

  • A. It was a general plan because it outlined overall AIMS processes to be audited every three years
  • B. It was a detailed plan because it focused only on specific AIMS processes to be audited every year
  • C. It was a detailed plan because it covered key AIMS processes

Answer: A

Explanation:
Roger created ageneral planbecause it outlinedbroad AIMS processesto be auditedon a triennial (three- year) cycle, not detailed annual or operational specifics.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4.1defines ageneral audit planas:"An overview that outlines the audits to be conducted over a period, typically linked to organizational objectives and risk exposure."
* Adetailed audit planwould break down yearly activities - which is not described here.
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4.1; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Manual Section 6 ("Audit Program Development").


NEW QUESTION # 83
Scenario 9 (continued):
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewingSecurisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and copyright its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Roger followed up on action plans after the external audit at Securisai, but he was directly involved in strategic decision-making processes, potentially affecting his audit objectivity.
Question:
Based on Scenario 9, which principle of internal auditing did Roger violate?

  • A. Integrity
  • B. Independence
  • C. Objectivity

Answer: B

Explanation:
Independenceis compromised when an auditor has direct involvement in the management or decision-making processes of the system being audited.
* ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5defines independence as:"The basis for the impartiality and objectivity of the audit conclusions."
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5reinforces that personnel auditing must be free from involvement in the area audited.
* By participating in strategic decision-making, Roger violated the independence principle.
Reference:ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5.


NEW QUESTION # 84
......

You can imagine that you just need to pay a little money for our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam prep, what you acquire is priceless. So it equals that you have made a worthwhile investment. Firstly, you will learn many useful knowledge and skills from our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide, which is a valuable asset in your life. After all, no one can steal your knowledge. In addition, you can get the valuable ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certificate.

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Review: https://www.surepassexams.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-exam-bootcamp.html

Report this page